1in Sum. col. entry written: EZENx[SIG₇] SIG₇ KI
2in Sum. col. entry written: EZEN×HA HA KI
3in Sum. col. entry written: EZEN×KU₃ KU₃ KI
4in Sum. col. entry written: EZEN×X DUN₃ KI
5in Sum. col. entry written: EZEN×X DUN₃-gunû KI
6in Sum. col. entry written: LAGAB×A A KI
note: sign-name written slightly into Akk. col.
7in Sum. col. entry written: LAGAB×A A KI
8in Sum. col. entry written: [LAGAB×A] A KI
9in Sum. col. entry written: URU×UD UD? KI; in photo 1st sign is URU not URU×MIN
note: sign-name written into Akk. col.
10in Sum. col. entry written: URU×HA HA KI
11in Sum. col. entry written: URU×UD UD KI
12in Sum. col. entry written: URU×UD UD KI
13in Sum. col. entry written: URU×UD UD KI
14for possible restorations of Akk. in this col., cf, 1882-08-15, 001 (P365245 < Kuyunjik) r ii 1ff
15in Sum. col.: in photo IDIM is graphically identical to BAD in previous line
16in Akk. col.: based on CT 11, pl. 49f (P365245; NA Diri 04) r ii 7, there may have been 2 entries in this line
note: sign-name written slightly into Akk. col.
17in Akk. col.: based on CT 11, pl. 49f (P365245; NA Diri 04) r ii 9, there may have been 2 entries in this line
18photo shows join at this point with no gap between previous & following lines, whereas CT 11, pl. 50 has 6 additional lines; copyist of CT 11, pl. 46 states: "Hiatus possibly larger" (also MSL 15 editor); likely a misjoin?
19The gloss ki-tu-uš is preserved in Haft Tépé Diri (P349885).
20see, Hunger, Kolophone, Assurbanipal Typ B
Edition by John Carnahan.