BMS 31[via caspo]

Obverse
oo NaN  (beginning obverse missing)
o 1'o 1'

x [...]

. . . [. . .]

o 2'2'

ša [...]

The one who [. . .]

o 3'3'

ša x [...]

The one who [. . .]

o 4'4'

ana-ku NENNI [A NENNI ša₂] DINGIR-šu₂ [NENNI diš₈-tar₂-šu₂ NENNI]-tu₄

I (am) so-and-so, [son of so-and-so], whose (personal) god (is) [so-and-so (and personal) goddess is so-and-s]o.

o 5'5'

a-na ka-[a]-ši at?-[kal-ki x x (x)]-kal1

In y[o]u I tr[ust . . .] . .

o 6'6'

ina PAP.ḪAL u MUNUS.KALAG.GA šu-zi-bi-in-[ni da₃-li₂-li₂]-ki lud-lul2

Deliver m[e] from hardship and difficulty, that I may sing your [praises].


o 7'7'

KA-INIM-MA ŠU-IL₂-LA₂ d[GAŠAN]-ANe3

The wording of a lifted-hand prayer to [Belet]-shamê.


o 8'8'

ina GE₆ ana IGI diš₈-tar₂ UR₃ SAR A KU₃ SUD

At night, in front of Ishtar, you sweep the roof (and) sprinkle pure water.

o 9'9'

GI.DU₈ GINan 7(diš)-ta-am₃ ŠUK-MEŠ tara-kas

You set up a portable altar. You prepare seven food ration portions.

o 10'10'

[NIG₂.NA] ŠIM.LI ta-sar₂-raq i-ṭi₂-ra u gi-mil-tu₂ kun-ni4

You strew [a censer] (with) juniper. (The ritual is) for establishing deliverance and favorable treatment.


o 11'11'

[EN₂ DINGIRti d]i-gi-gi bu-uk-rat d3(u) te-li-tu₂5

[Incantation: O goddess of the I]gigi, most capable daughter of Sin.

Reverse
rr NaN  (missing)

1Apparently, the tablet has suffered some damage since King's copy and Ebeling's transliteration; the A in ka-a-ši is now completely missing. Ebeling (1953: 122) suggests the end of the line be restored with at-[ta]-kal, "I have trusted" (likewise Zgoll 2003: 283). Although reasonable, there is room for at least four signs in the gap. It is therefore possible that the tablet may have in fact contained two verbs at the end of the line. Note the near parallel in Gula 1b, as attested by K.8105 (= P397492), rev. 19ˊ: [GAŠAN ana k]a-a-ši at-kal-ki MU-ki az₂-k[ur], "[O lady], I trust [i]n [y]ou, I inv[oke] your name." Perhaps we should restore a noun in the gap and a second [at]-kal at the line's end.

2The restoration follows Ebeling 1953: 122 and Zgoll 2003: 283.

3The restoration follows Zgoll 2003: 283; Ebeling 1953: 122 prefers to restore [be-let]-AN-e.

4The restoration follows Ebeling (1953: 122). Ebeling suggests the final phrase in the line is direct speech (see also Zgoll 2003: 284). If so, the line as it exists on the tablet may be corrupt (Ebeling 1953: 123,n.1). I take the phrase as a purpose clause.

5The restoration is based on BMS 30, rev. 12 (see Mayer 1976: 389 and Ebeling 1953: 122). It is uncertain.